(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-29 08:40 pm (UTC)
I've read that, thanks. And it's still "alleged" since no one's seen proof and one interviewer asked him where the money goes and he had no response- another issue altogether. I don't think it's the same thing. Emerson's not selling someone else's content repackaged for his profit- he's selling space to discuss the content.

Vander Ark is selling Rowling's ideas under his aegis. It's not authorized. I'd have to read more about it, but I think the argument that this is all fine because Rowling hasn't put her encyclopedia out in a timely fashion is specious at best. :P
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

May 2012

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags